zappie wrote:Most of their aircraft are quite good, with repaints being realistic to the real thing. I have had some problems with the flight dynamics of some of the aircraft like the 767, but like most things, try them out on test flights and if you are happy with the handling, keep it, otherwise dump it have fun!
Norm
Brandon Stoll wrote:Their CRJ sucks, messed up flight dynamics hehe. I used their planes before I got payware stuff, they're ok for free. But their Airbus for instance, comes with boeing sounds and flight decks, have to dl your own stuff to make it a true airbus, so I imaging the same for the other aircraft...as they use default microsoft stuff..you basically just get a paint job, a model and some physics. Like any major payware developers like PMDG, you're paying not just for the plane..you're paying for the time that went into it's development and the quality of realism it gives you. I guaruntee that POSKY's Queen isn't half of what PMDG's Queen is. I use to think the same way, why pay for payware stuff but really I'm glad I do now because it's way better then the free stuff out there (except that kicker Embraer I dled!)
Rob Fuller wrote:What is the difference between the 1900c and the 1900d?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 26 guests